What about the psychoanalysis at university today? If the psychoanalytic model is adopted for its coherence and pertinence with a clinical work which questions and rebuilds it, this approach imposes a rigorous reflection on and a taking into account of the unique characteristics of clinical situations other than the analytic cure. It constitutes an extremely dominant reference in the university research and is a part of a unique epistemological approach connected to individual phenomena. It does not put the human psychical functioning as a controllable or mastered object, but as an unknown - due to evasions of the unconscious from all definitive understandings. Psychopathology occupies a major place: it involves grasping of subject?s modalities of psychical functioning and of his potentialities for change, which belong to two problem areas: one, related to identity, putting to test the capacity to elaborate losses and the maintenance of a stable subjective identity; the other, psychosexual one, resides in the dynamics of identifications, of object choices and of their conflictual integration. This approach benefits from an original semiology, provided with ?clinical? data in a ?transference? relation, in extensive investigations, which use methods proper to clinical psychologist. Thus, projective methodology establishes an original clinical situation: the double axes of narcissistic and object investments (cathexis), conflicts, defensive characteristics, affects and representations, constitute the setting of data analysis. Neuroses, borderline and narcissistic pathologies and psychoses are presented in correspondance with the psychoanalytic and projective works which are dedicated to them.